The overriding purpose of a safety committee is to be the "staff advocate" for safety matters. This is usually done utilizing the Review, Recommend and Disseminate concept. For instance, the Safety Committee should review:
the details of any accidents that occur in the practice,
the specifics of any safety-related complaints from staff members or the leadership,
the procedures involved in any activity, service or program that could have adverse health or physical safety effects on the staff,
current literature, guidelines, regulations or position papers that relate to safety matters relevant to the practice operations.
Based on these ongoing reviews, the Safety Committee should develop specific Ado=s and don=ts@ policies to govern the safe operation of the practice. Although the Safety Committee does not have the specific authority to set or establish policy for the practice, it does have an implied authority to recommend procedures to the leadership of the practice. In most cases, it is expected that the leadership will adopt the recommended policies of the safety committee unless there is a clear and overwhelming reason to reject it. Rejection of Safety Committee recommendations is usually looked upon with a high degree of scrutiny during a regulatory agency review and perceived budgetary constraints are not usually considered "justification" for rejection.
Once the recommendation or policy is accepted or Asanctioned@ by the leadership, it becomes the shared responsibility of the leadership and the Safety Committee to disseminate the new policy or information to the staff. (See below for Raising Awareness ideas.)
The Safety Committee should be composed of enough members to
represent the diversity of the practice, but not so many as to
inhibit the conducting of business. Generally, there should be
a representative from the professional staff, the technical staff,
the animal caretaker staff and the reception or administrative
staff. It=s also normal to have one person represent two
segments (such as a technician representing the techs and the animal
caretaker staff).
In addition to the staff representation, there should be a
representative of the leadership. It=s best if this
representative were not the owner since that may bring some
Asituational intimidation@ to the process. Normally, the
leadership=s representative is the Practice Administrator or similar
person.
Finally, the Committee is typically Chaired by the Safety Director.
The Safety Director is the person who is charged with the overall
coordination of the hospital's safety program. The Safety
Director should be a person who has both the personality and the
"presence" to work individually with the entire practice team.
It's not critical that the Safety Director have authority for making
unilateral decisions in the practice, but it helps.
Safety Committee members can serve a set term or can be appointed
permanently. In small practices, it may be necessary for the
leadership to unilaterally appoint people to the Safety Committee,
but in most practices, the appointments should be made with staff
input. (Note: some states require a majority of safeety committee
members to be elected or appointed by the staff.)
Maybe.
In very small practices (like under 10 staff), communication
and decision making processes are relatively easy and most staff
members are
Ain tune@
with the issues of the practice.
In those instances, a committee form of problem solving may
not be necessary.
However in larger practices, especially those with more than one
Ashift@ or multiple locations,
communication and problem solving are an on-going challenge.
Those are the practices where a Safety Committee works best.
Formally, at least quarterly but preferably
monthly and whenever a situation arises that requires immediate
attention or action.
It's best to pick a reoccurring time and place to hold the Safety Committee meetings so that the meetings become part of the practice "flow." Try to schedule a time when interruptions will be minimized and attendance will be the greatest.
Have an Agenda!
First, the primary accident investigation
should be conducted by the supervisor or someone appointed by the
leadership of the practice.
This primary investigation should focus on finding out the
exact set of circumstances that led up to the accident and is often
referred to as the
AAccident Follow-up.@
In some cases, this is a pretty simple task such as when
someone is bitten by a fractious patient.
In other cases it may take a little
Adetective work.@
For instance, if a staff member complains of headaches then
passes out and must be treated at a hospital, reconstructing the
facts may take a little more time and effort.
The initial investigation should not try to affix blame for
the event or even judge whether a particular policy or action should
be changed. It should be
as prompt and complete as possible with written notes comparable to
the severity of the event.
(See sidebar for an example of the questions that should be
used during an accident investigation.)
Once the initial investigation is completed,
the accident report and investigator=s
notes are presented to the Safety Committee (or leadership if no
Committee is formed) for evaluation and review.
The job of the Safety Committee is to review the
circumstances of not only that accident, but any similar ones in the
recent past to determine if a trend or pattern may be developing.
Based on that review, the Safety Committee should make
recommendations to the leadership for changes in policy procedures
or even disciplinary action for willful violations of procedures.
In some cases, the Safety Committee may determine that the
accident was just that...an accident and no further action is
indicated. In other
cases, the Committee may recommend additional training for
individuals or groups and may even recommend restricted duties for
staff members with habitual accident histories.
C
No.
Some of the complaints related to the safety of a practice are
because a staff member doesn=t understand the rules or
needs additional training.
Of course, if the complaint or suggestion has merit, the
Safety Committee should review all possible aspects of the issue,
including the collection of scientific data and the recommendations
of experts in the field before issuing a recommendation to the
leadership. In any
event, communication back to the staff member making the complaint
or suggestion is vitally important if the Safety Committee is to
maintain credibility in the eyes of the staff.
Of course, that depends on the expectations of
the leadership and the
Ainitiative@ of the Committee Members.
In some practices, the execution of the Safety Committee
recommendations are executed by the leadership or other staff groups
so aside from the personnel time involved in the meetings, there is
almost no expense. In
other practices the Safety Committee produces newsletters or
bulletins, presents safety awards or even utilized incentives.
In those cases, a higher budget amount may be earmarked by
the leadership for Committee operations.
It=s
best for the Safety Committee to have very free control over the
expenditures of the committee up to a certain amount and not have to
get leadership approval for each little
Anickel
and dime@
item. This is viewed as
giving the Committee an appropriate recognition status in the
organization and not having it as an
Ainstrument
of the owners.@